Recent Episodes
-
#104 Annaka Harris - Is Consciousness Fundamental?
May 4, 2025 – 01:32:32 -
#103 Rhett McLaughlin - Why I Left Christianity
Apr 20, 2025 – 01:52:58 -
#102 David Deutsch - You're Not Smarter Than a Caveman
Apr 7, 2025 – 01:55:28 -
#101 Brian Greene - String Theory, Fine Tuning, and Divine Design
Apr 2, 2025 – 01:20:28 -
#100 Philosopher Shootout - 16 Thinkers, Ranked (With Joe Folley)
Mar 23, 2025 – 03:08:46 -
#99 Penn Badgley - My Religious Conflicts With Playing a Killer
Mar 17, 2025 – 01:56:26 -
#98 Jacob Hansen - A Mormon Explains Mormonism
Mar 10, 2025 – 02:21:53 -
#97 Kipp Davis - What Are the Dead Sea Scrolls?
Mar 2, 2025 – 02:15:06 -
#96 Music, Mormonism, and Peter Hitchens - 1.25m Subsrciber Q&A
Mar 1, 2025 – 01:01:46 -
#95 James McGrath: John the Baptist, the Bible's Most Mysterious Man
Jan 31, 2025 – 01:23:47 -
#94 Dan McClellan - What Does the Bible Say About Abortion?
Jan 27, 2025 – 01:19:56 -
#93 The Etymology Nerd - How Social Media is Transforming Our Language
Jan 21, 2025 – 01:09:39 -
#92 Bart Ehrman - The Dark Side of Christmas
Dec 20, 2024 – 01:01:16 -
#91 Filip Holm - What is Sufism? Islam and Mystical Experience
Dec 13, 2024 – 01:24:02 -
#90 Rainn Wilson - Reclaiming Spirituality From Traditional Religion
Dec 6, 2024 – 01:37:13 -
#89 The Cultural Tutor - The Philosophy and Ethics of Art
Nov 28, 2024 – 01:01:42 -
#88 Ayaan Hirsi Ali - Why I Converted To Christianity
Nov 22, 2024 – 01:02:37 -
#87 Cliffe and Stuart Knechtle - Biblical Slaves, Women, and the Unforgivable Sin
Nov 13, 2024 – 02:46:17 -
#86 Pre-Election Podcast - Destiny on Immigration, Trump, and Voter ID
Oct 31, 2024 – 01:38:07 -
#85 Magnify - 7 Translation Problems in Genesis
Oct 28, 2024 – 01:36:36 -
#84 David Nutt - The Truth About Drugs
Sep 22, 2024 – 58:54 -
#83 Esoterica - The History of the Demiurge
Sep 15, 2024 – 01:49:50 -
#82 Joe Folley - 9 Questions Atheists Cannot Answer
Sep 9, 2024 – 02:29:59 -
#81 Nick Bostrom - How To Prevent AI Catastrophe
Sep 1, 2024 – 01:01:56 -
#80 The Moustache,The Bible, and The Kalam - 850k QnA
Aug 25, 2024 – 52:29 -
#79 Elaine Pagels - The Origin of Satan
Aug 11, 2024 – 01:08:41 -
#78 Rory Sutherland - Why Logical Thinking is Illogical
Jul 29, 2024 – 01:48:47 -
#77 Bart Ehrman - What is the Gospel of Judas?
Jul 21, 2024 – 01:50:38 -
#76 Jonathan Pageau - Deconstructing the Fall of Adam and Eve
Jul 16, 2024 – 01:59:01 -
#75 Destiny on Jordan Peterson, Voting, and Political Principles
Jul 7, 2024 – 02:26:04 -
#74 Rabbi David Wolpe - What is Judaism?
Jun 30, 2024 – 01:19:25 -
#73 Arguments for Atheism Tier List w/ Joe Schmid!
Jun 23, 2024 – 02:35:55 -
#72 John Nelson - What Did Jesus Really Look Like?
Jun 16, 2024 – 01:04:32 -
#71 Unsolicited Advice - An Introduction to Nihilism
Jun 9, 2024 – 01:19:50 -
#70 Philosophize This! - A Beginner's Guide to Philosophy
Jun 2, 2024 – 01:19:12 -
#69 Iain McGilchrist - The Mind is More Than a Machine
May 26, 2024 – 01:40:28 -
#68 Andrew Mark Henry - What is The Gospel of Thomas?
May 19, 2024 – 01:23:56 -
#67 Elaine Pagels | What Are The Gnostic Gospels?
May 13, 2024 – 01:09:07 -
#66 Coleman Hughes - Should We Take Race Out of Politics?
May 5, 2024 – 59:19 -
#65 Esoterica - The History of Yahweh
Apr 28, 2024 – 01:44:30 -
#64 Rory Stewart - We Are Addicted to a Sense of Crisis
Apr 21, 2024 – 01:09:19 -
#63 A.C. Grayling - Who Will Own the Moon?
Apr 14, 2024 – 01:02:43 -
#62 750,000 Subscriber QnA
Apr 7, 2024 – 34:44 -
#61 Sam Harris - Can Science Determine Moral Values?
Mar 31, 2024 – 02:55:56 -
#60 Carlo Rovelli - Time is Weirder Than You Think
Mar 24, 2024 – 01:03:58 -
#59 William Lane Craig - Is Biblical Slaughter Ethical?
Mar 17, 2024 – 01:06:00 -
#58 Michael Knowles - Is America a Christian Nation?
Mar 10, 2024 – 01:24:12 -
#57 David Deutsch - The Multiverse is Real
Mar 5, 2024 – 01:35:40 -
#56 Susan Neiman - Left is Not Woke
Feb 18, 2024 – 52:56 -
#55 Robert Sapolsky - Free Will Doesn't Exist. Now What?
Feb 11, 2024 – 56:55
Recent Reviews
-
Yahya of GeorgiaMixed feelingsFor me, Alex O’Connor’s show is a mixed bag. On the one hand, he does bring on people who are genuinely experts in their field or at least know what they’re talking about. I love that he’s had on Bart Ehrman, Andrew Mark Henry (Religion for Breakfast), Justin Sledge (Esoterica) and Filip Holm (Let’s Talk Religion). He is actually making an effort to talk about religion from a historical, academic standpoint instead of doing those atheist takedowns of religion that give irreligious people a bad name. At the same time, there are also episodes that demonstrate my main issue with famous philosophers. They make blanket assumptions about history that isn’t backed up by anything. For example, on episode #55, Robert Sapolsky claims that cultures from the desert tend to be monotheistic while cultures from the rain forests tend to be polytheistic. Before the Abrahamic religions, however, basically every society was polytheistic (people like to bring up Zoroastrianism but even that had divinities besides Ahura Mazda). This blanket assumptions, which is based in the idea that Abrahamic religions represent all of religious history, kind of undermines Sapolsky’s premise. It’s not just him. I see this issue of making blanket assumptions about history that often aren’t even true among many philosophers on these types of shows.
-
WilderLeadGuess the others mindDavid is great but I think he was describing empathy as the ability to learn for the receiver. The transmitter can’t help a receiver learn if the receiver is not practicing some form of empathy for the transmitter. For a receiver to show empathy, they must receive it first. So everyone wants empathy before they give it, and then we form this weird isolated society. Thanks for this amazing umbrella of a talk!
-
PROFSWGHansen is a charlatannice try to make Jacob Hansen sound rational. I take particular umbrage of the garbage he spewed about archaeology. He actually should be sued by the archaeologists he quoted, who in one case I know. Thanks for trying Alex,I enjoy your shows ProfSWGreen, Anthropology
-
Barlow TonyCame for the metaphysics and metaethicsStayed for the meterphysics and meterethics
-
Lynna_marieThank youThank you for this podcast. I appreciate everything about it.
-
BurntFrontEndsExcellent resource for deep thinkersDespite being half my age, I feel a tad nervous offering any criticism about this show, which I truly believe is excellent! The only issue I have is that Alex occasionally comes across as a bit sanctimonious. Regardless, this is in my top 3 favorite podcasts, great work!
-
louisatjrA refreshing form of debateThis show is a refreshing form of debate where to people that disagree can come together and have a respectful conversation something lacking in todays world
-
Gump3434GinaAlex I just want to thank you for your willingness to engage with ALL people and their ideas without judgment and interruptions. I am a Christian and I just want you to know that I am praying for you to know Jesus and how much He truly does love you. Thank you for your kindness and love of all people. You remind me of Jesus in your respect for others. Thank you Alex.
-
mstoskiGreat ConversationsAlex is an excellent communicator, educator, conversationalist, and thinker.
-
HollowsceneIncorruptibleMorality is objective. Not subjective. The tribal apes are pragmatic to their tribe and pass it off as morality. Morality transcends tribalism. Morality is wanting for every single ape what you want for yourself. Then you have to go further for the opposite sex.
-
Pho. Bolo. H.FantasticI am very happy to have found this fascinating podcast! The host is very interesting and his guests are even more knowledgeable. Perfect.
-
Unbearable advertisementsAds wreck this showAds totally ruin the flow of this show. Unsubscribed.
-
NrusalkaguyChanged my LifeI am getting a philosophy minor because of this channel
-
Thisismyname19901An overcompensation toward “fairness”?It’s hard to fully describe my disappointment as I listen to Alex, an arguably brilliant young man, platform unserious people without significant pushback. The interview with Douglas Murray was truly abysmal, and the few times Alex critiqued Mr. Murray’s statements, the interviewee clutched hos pearls and Alex said “of course” or “yes, yes” moments later. It demonstrates either a lack of willingness to deconstruct opposing voices for fear of seeming unfair, or worse, an actual agreement with a man who speaks in hystaria, exaggeration, and carries one hundred straw men in his surely quite posh overcoat. Listen, the response to a critique such as this is that dissenting voices sparks debate, interest, and a broader understanding of the topic. However, if those dissenting voices are dripping with bottomless bad faith arguments and faux incredulity, then where is the value? The only possible outcome is propagandizing. It is wildly misguided and I expect a more analytical approach to, and reflection upon, such wretched polemics in the future.
-
Jt elrojoOfficially one of my favorite podcastsWithin Reason has gradually grown to be one of my favorite podcast, despite having very little interest in this channel when I first discovered it, after coming to realize the vastly different types of guests that appear on the show and the hosts ability to probe and challenge those ideas I have come to very much appreciate the content on this podcast
-
SYLinSDHow to make a respectful and a rational argumentI just listened to “Just Stop Oil” podcast. I rarely write a review but the argument from both the sides was so respectful of each other that I felt it was a highly educational dialog which taught me how to be respectful of the other viewpoint even if I may have a very repulsive view of the other side. It was the skill and patience of the podcaster which made it possible. Thank you for keeping the dialog “within the reason”.
-
Woke ScoldedI hope you’ve maturedListened to a couple of your more recent casts. Decided to go back and listen to some of your archived episodes and found the Peter Hitchens one of interest. Was appalled that you would air the sensational personal jibes at the end of that episode. I feel that was beneath you. Hope if you find yourself in a similar situation and the tables are turned, that you are treated more properly. Those who come on your show are “guests” right?
-
Part-Time BarbarianEpisode on YahwehLove the show. Love Alex, even as a Christian. I really appreciate his reasonableness and fairness. I hope he brings on someone to foil the latest episode on The History of Yahweh. If not, NT Wright’s “Christian Origins and the Question of God” series serves as a great foil to the Documentary Hypothesis/Evolution of Religion theory that he was proposing. This has been largely rendered obsolete but still holds on in some American institutions and maybe popular still by guys like Bart Ehrman. Mike F Bird of Ridley College would also be a great foil, to name just one. OT scholars like John Walton or John C Collins are more great foils. Loved the episode nonetheless
-
BZahaHam Sarris takedownProper philosopher gives Sam a proper asswhooping.
-
BdcanuckPeter Hitchens has convinced me that caffeine is a dangerous drug that we should criminalize!Put down the Earl Grey, Pete!
-
SkiBikeSwimRefreshing, Smart, and Unpretentious👌
-
Gio_BrunoDawkins was RightI was ready to listen to the most recent WLC episode with an open mind. After hearing the whole thing I agree with Dawkins 100%. I wish Alex would have pushed back more, especially when he tried to dodge the issue of ‘how do we know God actually commanded x’ by saying that it’s an epistemic question that he’s “not interested” in. Infuriating listen. Otherwise love the show.
-
FelikdunkirkGreat host…some unfortunate guestsAlex O’Connor is an honest, intelligent host, and I love to hear his reasoning concerning topics in which I’m interested. However, I find fault with him using his platform to host some genuinely dishonest individuals who refuse to use logic and rationally sound arguments. For example, William Lane Craig, who argues using logical fallacies, semantic games, and long-debunked god-claims, has appeared numerous times on this program. Such unscrupulous religious bigots already have too large a megaphone, and Mr. O’Connor shouldn’t be so accepting of individuals with such abhorrent ideas, logic, and morals.
-
BoilingrugKnowlesShow is overall great. Michael Knowles is beyond annoying. The guy has the easiest “tell.” As soon as he feels outmatched on a point, he interrupts by asking a condescending question. The Daily Wire “crew,” as it were, are the biggest bunch of fake intellectuals you’re likely to find.
-
SwarmopinionsAtheist and other non believersTypical liberal arts atheist psychobabble
-
KoolaidGioLove this podcastBest podcast
-
dasrageBravoExcellent podcast. Particularly the episodes with Bart Ehrman. Very insightful.
-
ZachydjBest of the best interview podcastAlex is an incredibly bright fellow and a fantastic interviewer. I never miss an episode
-
Bjk12345678yMy new Favorite podcastAmazing podcast
-
Mig71994Debate and dialogue at its best!Enjoy every episode!
-
SchafferDadCurrent favorite podcastAlex has a great capacity to listen patiently and press gently to bring about very engaging conversations.
-
Dave cherryFantastic!I've been following Alex's content for several years. It's been a tremendous joy. Alex has a brilliant mind. Jump in and enjoy.
-
PeppyDolphinThoughtful InterviewsAlex is an awesome thinker and interviewer
-
Ayo TréAlex O’Connor growth from strictly atheism to philosophy is astounding.As an atheist myself, I love to hear from atheists who are not a Reddit stereotype.
-
Philly IversonGreat show!Well done program!
-
Steve de los GuantesCan’t wait to dig inI can’t understand how I missed the fact that one of my all time favorite philosophy communicators had a podcast. YouTube has really been messing up the algorithm because I just recently was recommended a clip of his that made me aware of this. So excited to get started.
-
rootietootiefreshandfrutyFantastic podcast!!I have been an Alex O’Connor fan ever since my deconversion. The manner that he conducts himself comes through his content. It’s not a hairbrained free form podcast. He treats guests of every faith background with incredible respect. I love the way everything is structured and held together.
-
Sam CarlsenGreat philosophy podcastExcellent, fair, even-keeled discussions about religion and philosophy from interesting and insightful people
-
amdavis36Long time listener, first time callerI’m a big fan of Alex, Within Reason, and his YouTube work, which is ironic since I am unapologetically a believer in God. But I love how Alex navigates conversations of consequential importance in a caring, non-divisive manner. He is respectful to all of his guests, and asks thought provoking questions that have equally challenged my faith, and strengthened it. I’m sure that’s not his goal, but nevertheless, he’s been a joy to follow. Alex, I’m always praying for you. Thank you for all you do.
-
n7754Excellent Podcast—Super excited about the weekly content.I’ve been a huge fan of Alex’s going on 5 years now. His ability to brilliantly examine philosophical, ethical, and theological topics and convey his thoughts with clarity is unmatched. My only complaint over the past few years has been not enough context! Of course I know he’s been busy, but this new podcast schedule has me excited. Can’t wait for the intellectually stimulating food for thought every week. Alex, keep doing what you’re doing. Nothing but respect for you. You’ve been a huge positive impact on my life. And get Jordan Peterson on here!!!
-
Kungfuboi10Philosophy is beautifulIt’s amazing how he pushes back on every guest he has on the show. This is honest work.
-
HVAC CXerPhilosophy rulesIf you like philosophy and good conversation about religion and big ideas, this podcast is for you. Alex is genuine and cares about people.
-
dbenkovics84GoodI feel like he’s a smart and genuine person
-
Ajaz0810Very goodI like the dialogue with people that he disagrees in order to learn more. We need more of this in todays society.
-
CallMeKareemFantasticAlways excited to hear more!
-
StormFighter007👑I appreciate Alex’s ability to articulate his thoughts in such a patient and coherent way to and with fellow thinkers. There is a clarity to Alex’s way of communicating that I would love to see more of. Thanks Alex—Keep up the great work!
-
SayydzGreat interviews with philosophers, authors, and public intellectuals.I love Alex’s content on here, it’s been great listening to his chats with his friends and idols. However , his YouTube channel is also worth checking out, as he doesn’t upload anymore on here :/
-
Mikhail PantyushenkoWonderful!Simply wonderful!
-
I am a *STAR*Civilized Conversations of Critical ThoughtI love Alex’s style of interviewing. He’s not afraid to press guests on the finer points of their arguments while always being respectful.
-
Nando32123Great interviewer!Alex never ceases to amaze me in his development as an interviewer, speaker, and thinker. Like all of us, he has a ways to go, but he has already show remarkable progress and continues to be one of the individuals whose content I most look forward to listening to. Would love to see him explore Effective Altruism a bit more, with perhaps Will MacAskill or Toby Ord (or any other major proponents of EA) on to discuss longtermism and other such notions that underpin their ethics.
Similar Podcasts

Practical Stoicism

Philosophy For Our Times

The Michael Shermer Show

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

The Origins Podcast with Lawrence Krauss

Decoding the Gurus

Biblical Time Machine

Misquoting Jesus with Bart Ehrman

Data Over Dogma

The Poetry of Reality with Richard Dawkins

Unbelievable?

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

TheThinkingAtheist

Very Bad Wizards

Philosophize This!
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork on this page are property of the podcast owner, and not endorsed by UP.audio.