Not sure how a 'grants researcher' for medicine & science qualifies as an interviewer on issues dealing with intellectual & religious history. The bench at NB Network can't be that shallow can it?

The host for that episode asked profoundly dumb question. He almost implied the program was about him and his questions.

Seriously disappointed with the increase in low-quality, poorly-researched right wing apologia recently chosen for inclusion. Differing viewpoints is one thing, but please pick books without easily debunked claims in the book description. I know the standards for conservative and right wing intellectuals are lower, but please don’t waste anybody’s time with this recent quasi-red-scare nonsense

Please improve quality of the audio. Also, the podcast host needs to improve her interviewing skills ,

Love the content, hope audio quality will match it soon.